G says NIR SUCKs for a Buck

~ OOC forums for the Guilds version of the Classic game.
Please be courteous while posting and observe the forum rules.

Moderators: Staff, Game Staff

Fireslash
First Centurion
Posts: 155
Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2009 3:40 am
Contact:

Re: G says NIR SUCKs for a Buck

Post by Fireslash » Wed Sep 25, 2013 3:02 pm

I got a good feeling it won't ;)

~Fire

User avatar
Reylan Talonspyre
Teacher
Posts: 537
Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 3:26 am
Contact:

Re: G says NIR SUCKs for a Buck

Post by Reylan Talonspyre » Thu Sep 26, 2013 12:10 am

I am glad we are still having some fun. I see my human kingdom has been obliterated. Nice hit.
I think I would make a great pope.
Gatekeepers

User avatar
Aeropagitica
Explorer
Posts: 323
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 11:13 pm
Location: Wilmington, NC
Contact:

Re: G says NIR SUCKs for a Buck

Post by Aeropagitica » Thu Sep 26, 2013 12:15 am

I just dropped 40k acres on Nyrond. Does that count? :oops:
VIVA NIR!

User avatar
Aeropagitica
Explorer
Posts: 323
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 11:13 pm
Location: Wilmington, NC
Contact:

Re: G says NIR SUCKs for a Buck

Post by Aeropagitica » Thu Sep 26, 2013 12:23 am

Reylan Talonspyre wrote:Gatekeepers and SUCK are willing to accept your surrender at any time. We have a single, unwavering condition of our own:

NIR will restore any of their kingdoms within the top 10.
My Logic Diagrams are a bit old, but as I recall, a Single Condition being IF any top_10 ten kingdoms restore, you will have peace, sounds like only one kingdom has to restore.
Just saying. You did make me smile though! That we should surrender... :lol:
I realize I'm not negotiating anymore, but how about this: We shall grant peace, and restore 1 of our top 10 kingdoms for each top 20 kingdom you restore.
VIVA NIR!

User avatar
Darnivan
Traveler
Posts: 153
Joined: Fri Dec 07, 2012 6:55 am

Re: G says NIR SUCKs for a Buck

Post by Darnivan » Thu Sep 26, 2013 2:43 am

Low blow man, low blow.

Fireslash
First Centurion
Posts: 155
Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2009 3:40 am
Contact:

Re: G says NIR SUCKs for a Buck

Post by Fireslash » Thu Sep 26, 2013 9:35 am

We are actually very close, the goal of the war wasn't really to win but to make the game closer and hell have some smurf head

Though it would have been nice to win :lol:
Last edited by Fireslash on Thu Sep 26, 2013 9:42 am, edited 1 time in total.

Fireslash
First Centurion
Posts: 155
Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2009 3:40 am
Contact:

Re: G says NIR SUCKs for a Buck

Post by Fireslash » Thu Sep 26, 2013 9:36 am

To peace that is

User avatar
Reylan Talonspyre
Teacher
Posts: 537
Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 3:26 am
Contact:

Re: G says NIR SUCKs for a Buck

Post by Reylan Talonspyre » Fri Sep 27, 2013 12:36 am

LOL Aero, at the end of this, we may take you up on that if you pummel us like you have been. :-)
I think I would make a great pope.
Gatekeepers

User avatar
Jokingjoe
Second Centurion
Posts: 1204
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2010 7:35 pm
Location: New Bern, NC
Contact:

Re: G says NIR SUCKs for a Buck

Post by Jokingjoe » Fri Sep 27, 2013 5:29 am

Sorry Rey--Aero is not the negotiator--and he only mentioned that because none of your kingdoms are in the top 20.

Fireslash
First Centurion
Posts: 155
Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2009 3:40 am
Contact:

Re: G says NIR SUCKs for a Buck

Post by Fireslash » Fri Sep 27, 2013 6:26 am

So why is LKA joining this war and attacking us? Do you not have a big enough advantage as it is :roll:

~Fire

User avatar
Leif
RAGE >.<
Posts: 172
Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 1:00 pm

Re: G says NIR SUCKs for a Buck

Post by Leif » Fri Sep 27, 2013 1:57 pm

I can't wait to hear LKA's justification for this one :P
-}}}Dulcius ex Asperis >
Gatekeepers...SUCK?

User avatar
Aeropagitica
Explorer
Posts: 323
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 11:13 pm
Location: Wilmington, NC
Contact:

Re: G says NIR SUCKs for a Buck

Post by Aeropagitica » Fri Sep 27, 2013 2:28 pm

Good question. Dreck?
VIVA NIR!

User avatar
Carlos Danger
Wayfarer
Posts: 85
Joined: Mon Aug 05, 2013 1:48 am

Re: G says NIR SUCKs for a Buck

Post by Carlos Danger » Fri Sep 27, 2013 2:33 pm

My assumption(I know I know) is its Dreck. After we had peace with LKA he continued to do what he wanted so that's probably the case here. If its more then just him then yeah some explaining would be nice. Other then a little discussion on thread titles and some misunderstandings here and there its seems to be a good war and really doesn't need any interfering.
TRR - The Red Ranks
Figurehead Extraordinaire
PM for pics

User avatar
Dreck
Wayfarer
Posts: 90
Joined: Sat Jul 10, 2010 10:05 am
Location: Wild Wild West
Contact:

Re: G says NIR SUCKs for a Buck

Post by Dreck » Fri Sep 27, 2013 3:21 pm

LKA is not in this war. I just wanted to hit a kingdom. Leto does not deserve to be on top. They have done nothing to earn it. This is a Monarchy. People would come whenever they please and strike whatever foe for whatever cause they chose. You outnumbered us. In my opinion, I don't know why two different faiths join to fight one. That is weird. Turns mean alot in this game, you heathens have a lot more turns to play with than my faithmates. When a ruler sees kingdoms being struck by more kingdoms, he will impose. It doesn't matter that his mates have more land than the strikers, It still is more leaders and more action and communication for them. They have access to 2 databases. And who knows maybe scummers that can join in unseen for Leto an Barnabas. In Monarchy times, the leaders of their lands did not do fair strikes, nor were they responded to fairly. Alliances can come and go as they please, like it really was. But do not consider me an ally of the war, but of the faith. Consider me unguilded. Kill me. I don't care. I haven't had a conversation with anyone in my guild since I joined anyways. LKA will not retaliate. If they wish to boot me or quit I will. I have had no action all age. I will do anything to try and win it for my goddess, since the only man I would ever worship is myself. I have been bullied long enough by CORE by having I think all of their members hitting me, so I want to hurt a Letite. This age and last age, I chose my faith randomly and got Angelique both times. Chose my race randomly too. Coming the 3rd age, I couldn't imagine playing for any other faith since I really don't care for being in any of the guilds I see in Leto or Barnabas. As for race, I guess I'll go goblin being that Dauthi keeps his guild and faith and that he accepts me. And if I ever got caught scumming, it was on purpose. I want you to play your turns on me. I see there is a feature here that lets you see a post that has been posted while you were writing yours. I will always aim for the head, at that time it was TRR this time its the top of SUCK. Peace was never declared with TRR since our GM never accepted it. Peace is with CORE since I see that our GM has been inactive since forever.
Angelique
Open for business
Scummer
Scouting your kingdom since the beginning of time

User avatar
Jokingjoe
Second Centurion
Posts: 1204
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2010 7:35 pm
Location: New Bern, NC
Contact:

Re: G says NIR SUCKs for a Buck

Post by Jokingjoe » Fri Sep 27, 2013 5:49 pm

Dreck, you should talk to Dauthi. You would get along, I think.

Either way, saying Leto doesn't deserve to be on top is no justification for hitting Fireslash (who is not even in the top 20). While we appreciate your zeal, please desist from making open strikes against the Gatekeepers or Fireslash for the duration of our war. We are an honorable organization and can not support intervention on our behalf.

User avatar
Leif
RAGE >.<
Posts: 172
Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 1:00 pm

Re: G says NIR SUCKs for a Buck

Post by Leif » Fri Sep 27, 2013 8:47 pm

Dreck,
Your eagerness to fight for your faith is... charming. However, in a guilds game, the alliances that make up guilds do play a significant part of the strategy and politics of the game, as well as faith. In times where player base is relatively low, guilds do what they feel necessary to create fair hits, including ally with guilds of other faith. In fact, history is ripe with the concept that sharing an enemy can make allies out of anyone. No war will ever be perfectly even in stats, and everyone will place differing values on different stats based on personal preferences. Turns do make a difference, but they are not a deciding factor, as clearly demonstrated by the slow but steady trajectory of this war. If you had been watching the war and the stats you would have easily been able to see this. Hell, G even posted stats suggesting as much in this very thread.

I would have hoped that in LKA you would have developed some concept of the social and political side of the guilds game, but apparently you've been left to your own devices and that's unfortunate and I'm sure takes much of the fun out of the game. But striking at guilded kingdoms engaged in war takes the fun out of the game for others, and shows a lack of respect I am sure you would wish afforded to you and your guildmates, were the situation reversed. I don't speak for G, SUCK or NIR but myself in saying that your disinterest in potential consequences for your actions suggests a lack of responsibility and honour not only for yourself, but for your faith-mates who's good clean fun you are messing with and dirtying. Actions like that stain an otherwise difficult but well fought war.

By the sounds of it you've had a difficult age and frustration can easily set in. Perhaps you should take your scumming skills to an individual game? I play Bloodbath as well as guilds and that place is all sorts of fun and chaos and entirely faith-based. Everyone gets beat around, so although the beatings are frustrating at least no one is safe :p

If these are the morals you want to play this game under, by all means play unguilded or with Dauthi, it might be fun for the poor guy to have some company smacking people around at will :p But show the impluse control of an adult and adjust your standing in the game to match the morals you intend to play under before lashing out, instead of interfering in an issue affecting like half the player base with an ill-thought out action.
-}}}Dulcius ex Asperis >
Gatekeepers...SUCK?

User avatar
Dreck
Wayfarer
Posts: 90
Joined: Sat Jul 10, 2010 10:05 am
Location: Wild Wild West
Contact:

Re: G says NIR SUCKs for a Buck

Post by Dreck » Sat Sep 28, 2013 2:55 am

So be it. I am unguilded. As Eric Cartman says, "It's my life, I'll do what I want!"
Angelique
Open for business
Scummer
Scouting your kingdom since the beginning of time

User avatar
Darnivan
Traveler
Posts: 153
Joined: Fri Dec 07, 2012 6:55 am

Re: G says NIR SUCKs for a Buck

Post by Darnivan » Sat Sep 28, 2013 3:38 am

Anyways Gatekeepers, we stopped by for a visit tonight...you should probably all restore.

GATEKEEPERS Land: 27,639 5,528
G Built: 27,260 5,452
5 / 6 Members Networth: 780,013 156,003

Fireslash
First Centurion
Posts: 155
Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2009 3:40 am
Contact:

Re: G says NIR SUCKs for a Buck

Post by Fireslash » Sat Sep 28, 2013 4:15 am

You have no kingdoms over 50k acres, my conditions for peace have been met

let me know what you want to do, game is pretty damn even again

~Fire

User avatar
Reylan Talonspyre
Teacher
Posts: 537
Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 3:26 am
Contact:

Re: G says NIR SUCKs for a Buck

Post by Reylan Talonspyre » Sat Sep 28, 2013 5:53 am

We officially offer our surrender to NIR.

I don't speak for Fire, but you guys did a bang up job of blasting us to bits. If we don't hear from you by 8 PM CST tomorrow, we will continue with our suicide sorc attacks, as planned.

I had a lot of fun this war, got the blood pumping, got the war chats going. Glad to see we inflicted heavy damage on you and yours, but I would rather not bog everyone down with suicide attacks.

Let me know.
I think I would make a great pope.
Gatekeepers

Post Reply

Return to “Guilds”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests