[Tribunal Complete] Well Crafted Spam vs Thread-Jacking

Closed Tribunals will be moved to this forum. If you would like to reopen a closed Tribunal for redebate, please post a Tribunal Request.

Moderator: Staff

How should we deal with spam and thread-jacking?

All spam should be banned
0
No votes
Spam is ok, but thread Jacking should never be tolerated
0
No votes
Spam should be allowed in all instances, [NoSpam] tag should be used
1
17%
Moderators should use own judgement, and split thread-jacking into its own topic
5
83%
Other option, see post.
0
No votes
 
Total votes: 6

User avatar
Mickal Redwater
Explorer
Posts: 388
Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 9:29 pm
Location: Middle of the Desert
Contact:

Re: [Under Judgement] Well Crafted Spam vs Thread-Jacking

Post by Mickal Redwater » Tue Oct 06, 2009 1:42 am

I like that idea. the [No Spam] idea is kinda not a great idea in my mind.

However.. if you split a thread into a new topic... how will those of us who have posted in it know this happened? Other than looking confused around the forum for time trying to figure it out.

I assume it'll be posted in the thread in question?
Lancelot: Would it not be a comfort, just for a time, to believe that we create our own Heavens, and our own Hells?
FEL forever

User avatar
Gerien
Teacher
Posts: 908
Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 7:22 pm
Location: depends who hires me

Re: [Under Judgement] Well Crafted Spam vs Thread-Jacking

Post by Gerien » Tue Oct 06, 2009 2:01 am

I just voted. Either something is wrong or I just got a lot more power than I expected. I guess that means something is wrong, because no one in their right mind would give me power.

[edit]I voted #4, btw. Moderators should use own judgment, and split thread-jacking into its own topic. I also corrected the spelling of judgment in this post rotfl.[/edit]
And I never even got my own damn posting title!

User avatar
Kaz
Administrator
Posts: 2606
Joined: Thu Sep 24, 2009 1:27 am
Location: The Vinyards of Fernabergia
Contact:

Re: [Under Judgement] Well Crafted Spam vs Thread-Jacking

Post by Kaz » Tue Oct 06, 2009 3:10 am

That was a mistake when i set up the change in permissions.

Yours and owly's votes were removed.

Just waiting on Gili it seems
Programming is 10% science, 25% ingenuity and 65% getting the ingenuity to work with the science
Wars of Tonan (Monarchy Inspired Miniatures)
Armatures for Sculpting Miniatures

User avatar
owly
Sage
Posts: 3084
Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 1:57 am
Location: stoned
Contact:

Re: [Under Judgement] Well Crafted Spam vs Thread-Jacking

Post by owly » Tue Oct 06, 2009 3:05 pm

One Man one Vote
i know what you said about my Momma

User avatar
MoP
Savant
Posts: 1316
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 2:16 pm
Contact:

Re: [Under Judgement] Well Crafted Spam vs Thread-Jacking

Post by MoP » Tue Oct 06, 2009 3:06 pm

Kaz wrote:Just waiting on Gili it seems


Good luck on that one ...
Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs and the Universe trying to build bigger and better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning.

User avatar
Gili
Community Admin
Posts: 737
Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 10:00 am
Location: Northampton, England

Re: [Under Judgement] Well Crafted Spam vs Thread-Jacking

Post by Gili » Tue Oct 06, 2009 4:09 pm

I just voted
Moderators should use own judgement, and split thread-jacking into its own topic


I spam on occasion, so saying spam should be allowed seems hypocritical. Additional labelling threads (No Spam) seems a little excessive. Overall, it would be nice to for folks to think before spamming to much. If your just spamming shit between two posters take it to chat...if not, mods can do their thing.

*kicks MoP*

I've been busy fucking about with a few irc servers...meh they are all sooooooooo unnecessarily complicated. I have a decent one up and running, i just need to get some icq type services running ( chanserv, nickserv...etc ).
"Man will never be free until the last king is strangled with the entrails of the last priest"

Contactable on gtalk & msn via sshagent @ gmail . com

User avatar
Nagash
Master
Posts: 2394
Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 8:53 am

Re: [Under Judgement] Well Crafted Spam vs Thread-Jacking

Post by Nagash » Wed Oct 07, 2009 9:51 am

So what's the final verdict?



On a side note: judgment and judgement are both correct.
If word gets out that I'm missing, 500 girls will kill themselves and I wouldn't want them on my conscience - not when they ought to be on my face!

User avatar
Gili
Community Admin
Posts: 737
Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 10:00 am
Location: Northampton, England

Re: [Under Judgement] Well Crafted Spam vs Thread-Jacking

Post by Gili » Wed Oct 07, 2009 10:50 am

The final vote ended

Code: Select all

Spam should be allowed in all instances, [NoSpam] tag should be used       17%    [ 1 ]
Moderators should use own judgement, and split thread-jacking into its own topic       83%    [ 5 ]   
"Man will never be free until the last king is strangled with the entrails of the last priest"

Contactable on gtalk & msn via sshagent @ gmail . com

Locked

Return to “Closed Tribunals”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest